No content found

Standards & Guidelines 15 SEPT 2020
Distributed Digitization
13 OCT 2020
Resource-challenged Digitization
17 NOV 2020
Achieving Excellence in . . .
15 DEC 2020


Federal Agencies Digital
Guidelines Initiative

JOIN US for a series of four meetings on achieving excellence in cultural heritage imaging. Register for one—or for all four. Add access to the recordings of two relevant short courses that were given at Archiving 2020 for a small fee:

SC01 Scanner & Camera Imaging Performance: Ten Commandments
Instructors: Peter Burns & Don Williams
Length: 2 hours

SC09  Best Practices for Implementing a FADGI Compliant Color Digitization Workflow
Instructors: David Wyble & Thomas Rieger
Length: 2 hours

Please note: All sessions will be recorded and registrants will have access to the recordings—including Q&A—until 15 April 2021 to accommodate your schedule, as well as to allow you to go back and review details.




Imaging Standards and Guidelines: Managing Imaging for Cultural Heritage, Peter D. Burns, Burns Digital Imaging LLC
Abstract: For the past two decades, imaging experts organized under the ISO have developed standardized approaches for how to evaluate digital camera and scanner imaging performance. For example, measuring; resolution, exposure, noise, geometric distortion, and color. Several of these have been adopted under guidelines for imaging practice for cultural heritage communities. Following discussion of their development, this talk describes how imaging guidelines are used to specify requirements, select equipment, and support quality assurance efforts. They have also been instrumental in debunking the ‘specsmanship’ of marketing hype, by aiding in objective evaluation and comparison..

Evaluating Spatial Performance for Digital Capture Systems, Don Williams, Image Science Associates
Abstract: Whenever spatial imaging performance is considered in the context of digital imaging, megapixels or dots per inch are often the immediate responses that entertain one’s thinking. While such quantity numbers do set an upper limit on potential resolution of a digital capture system, they mask the quality constraints on quantity. Increasing one, does not compensate for the limits set by the other. This talk shows how, ultimately, the quality and diagnostics of spatial imaging performance are largely dictated by a primary metric, the Spatial Frequency Response (SFR) as specified is ISO 12233.

In an artifact free world, the SFR alone is an excellent indicator of spatial imaging performance, but Mother Nature is not so kind. Spatial noise artifacts introduced in digital capture are numerous. Streaking, banding, color fringing, and de-mosaicing errors are just some of the vernacular terms used to describe such spatial noise artifacts not necessarily diagnosed by the SFR. Some even challenge one’s ability to describe them. Recognizing these artifacts is difficult and error prone with analytical tools which is why visual inspection of them in image editors is often the best approach for identification.

This talk provides examples of both ideal SFRs and spatial artifact corrupted images to help calibrate the attendee.

Evaluating Color Performance, Dave Wyble, Avian Rochester LLC
Abstract: This talk begins with a brief introduction to color measurement appropriate for applications in the DigiTIPS series. It then explores the color metrics as specified in the relevant standards and guidelines. The metrics are "peeled apart" for a more in-depth understanding  than simple aggregate statistics—there is much to be learned besides mean ΔE! Spectral measurement and evaluation are introduced. Finally, some common questions about sources, illuminants, and observers are addressed, and some misconceptions debunked.

FADGI, Metamorfoze, ISO . . . What's the Difference?, Dietmar Wüller, Image Engineering GmbH
Abstract: Back in 2011 the world of image quality evaluation in cultural heritage was divided into the US and Europe. Projects in the US were mainly following the Federal Agencies Digitization Guidelines Initiative (FADGI) and projects in Europe were often based on the Metamorfoze standard, developed by the Dutch Royal Library. Both guidelines defined methods and thresholds for various image quality parameters. Customers, as well as manufacturers of equipment, started asking themselves which standard was better and which to support?

The logical approach was to unify the procedures and thresholds by creating an international standard, which today has become the ISO 19264—but there is more to it than that. The ISO committee also put together a document with best practices and a vocabulary standard to help people and institutions getting digitization projects to work.

This talk explains the documents in some detail and provides an overview of the defined procedures and thresholds, as well as the implementation of image quality evaluation in workflows.

Jeanine Nault, Smithsonian Institution


13 OCTOBER 2020 


Smithsonian Mass Digitization Work Safe Initiative for COVID-19 and the Future, Jeanine Nault, Smithsonian Institution
Abstract: The Smithsonian Digitization Program Office (DPO) Mass Digitization team is responsible for integrating mass digitization into the core functions of the Smithsonian, using a sustained, high throughput, high quality, cost-efficient, end-to-end digitization approach. “Mass digitization” as we practice it, pertains to digitizing a large number of archival or museum collection items while also maintaining a high level of object care, safety, and image quality, which we do through a three-step workflow approach that we have piloted, refined, and proven successful, digitizing over 3 million Smithsonian collection items since 2015.

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we began crafting a comprehensive document of health and safety protocols for our mass digitization production projects and the teams that work on them, which are a collaboration between the Smithsonian museums, the DPO, the National Collections Program (NCP), and various digitization vendors. The living document draws from reliable public health programs such as the Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization, Johns Hopkins University, as well as internal Smithsonian Directives on health, safety, wellness, and environmental programs.

The health and safety protocol, or Work Safe Initiative, has five (5) sections, including Project Requirements, Health and Safety guidelines, Equipment Sanitization and Production Space needs, Collections Care collaboration, and relevant signage for work spaces. This presentation will address all five sections in detail, as well as how mass digitization addresses mission critical needs for the Smithsonian during the current pandemic climate and beyond, as virtual spaces and digital content become essential to research, scholarship, education, collections care, and public outreach..

Moving The Library of Congress Forward in Light of COVID19, Tom Rieger, Library of Congress
Abstract: This talk provides an overview of the changes and adjustments being implemented to the access-based digitization program at the Library of Congress to adapt to the new normal.  Adjustments to the workflow process and implementation of an all-new remote post-processing methodology using both basic and high-end laptop computers in telework, without compromising image quality or production efficiency, are detailed in the presentation.

Planning and Managing Outsourced Digital Imaging Projects, David Walls, US Government Printing Office
Abstract: Outsourcing digital imaging work is the only option for those without an in-house facility and with limited staff.  Whatever the size of your project or production need, you can design, plan, and manage digital imaging work with contract vendors that meets your organization’s preservation and access needs. 

Providing Digitization Services to External Cultural Heritage Collections, Peter Thiesen, Royal Danish Library
Abstract: The Royal Danish Library has programs in place to digitize books, journals, newspapers, archival materials, maps, graphic art, photographs, audio-visual recordings, and other cultural heritage objects. As a national institution, the Library finances its core digitization activities out of public funds (the state’s finance act) and grant-financed projects. To augment this, the Library has developed a business model that takes in digitization projects from external institutions on marked terms. This commercial service allows the Library to exploit the capacity of our workflows and enhances our overall efficiency, thereby benefiting our internal digitization projects. The digitization quality standards and guidelines we've put in place help us market this service to outside entities.

Pandemic-Proof Digitization, Peter Grisafi, Picturae
Abstract: It takes a team to digitize, but only two to spread a virus. This talk explores different ways your team can tackle a digitization project without ever coming face-to-face with one another. Picturae handles projects across the globe, and this talk shares some insights as to what we’ve learned about the efficacy of remote communication and control.

Pseudo-rapid Imaging at MOMA, Kurt Heumiller, Museum of Modern Art
Abstract: While the nature of fine art collections do not always lend themselves to rapid imaging, the challenge to maintain production during reduced staffing and need for increased social distancing has led to a reevaluation of practices. This talk discusses the question of how rapid imaging practices and digitization guidelines fit in a modern art museum and how can they be adapted to serve the museum's needs.

MEETING CHAIR: Jeanine Nault, Smithsonian Institution


17 NOVEMBER 2020


Title TBA, Franziska Frey and Megan Sniffin-Marinoff, Harvard University
Abstract: Coming

Developing a Digitization Center at the General Archives of Puerto Rico,
Hilda Teresa Ayala-Gonzalez, Instituto de Cultura Puertorriqueña
Abstract: In 2019, following recommendations provided by a damage assessment report, the General Archives of Puerto Rico secured a special assignment from the government to develop a pilot project for the creation of a digitization center. Basic equipment was acquired, standards were selected, areas were prepared, and personnel was trained. The pilot project commenced February 11, 2020, and a month later, on March 13th, the lock down began. During this month of work, many issues arose that prompted an opportunity to evaluate what was implemented and sought for further funding. This presentation shares the challenges and successes experienced by the creation of our digitization center, under economical constraints and uncertain times.

Sharp, Accurate, Beautiful: Fine Art Digitization without Breaking the Bank!, Christopher Campbell, artist
Abstract: With sufficient knowledge, the quality with which cultural heritage materials can be digitized need not be constrained by limited resources. I am a successful practicing artist with a deep interest in photography, and over the years have assembled — with a limited budget — a set of equipment and procedures that allows me to digitize drawings and paintings at a level comparable to a major institution (FADGI 3–4 star). Components include a 96" copy stand I built from standard aluminum extrusions (80/20), Sony sensors (a7R III, Phase One IQ3 100MP Trichromatic), Zeiss and Rodenstock lenses, color-constant flashes (Einstein E640), and my own object-level targets. Critical workflow details include optimal exposure via RawDigger, superb color profiles from basICColor input pro 6, and image processing and file management (worklist numbering, keywording, cataloging) via Adobe Lightroom (160K images).

Remainder of program being finalized

MEETING CHAIR: Jeanine Nault, Smithsonian Institution


15 DECEMBER 2020 

CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS:  Do you have a compelling story to tell about how you achieved excellence, with the help of guidelines or standards, in a specific media (illuminated manuscripts, papyrus leaves, ancient texts), technique (multispectral, 3D), process (training, documentation, succession planning), etc.? Share your lessons learned and success stories with fellow cultural heritage imaging professionals. Send an email with a talk title and outline to with subject line: For DigiTIPS <<Your Last Name>>. The committee will review the submissions for inclusion. List of talks/speakers will be updated as submissions are received.

See above Call for Presentations.

MEETING CHAIR: Jeanine Nault, Smithsonian Institution

No content found